
SEC Repeals SAB 121: A Turning Point for Crypto Regulation
On January 24, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) repealed Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB 121), a move that has been met with widespread approval from financial institutions and the broader crypto industry. This article breaks it all down.
INTRODUCTION TO CRYPTO
CryptoTokin
5 min read


SEC Repeals SAB 121: A Turning Point for Crypto Regulation
On January 24, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) repealed Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121, a move that has been met with widespread approval from financial institutions and the broader crypto industry. Introduced in 2022, SAB 121 required SEC registrants to record an obligation to safeguard the crypto assets they held at the fair value of the related assets. While aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability, this bulletin faced criticism for creating significant hurdles, particularly for banks and financial institutions, in developing digital asset products and services.
The American Bankers Association (ABA), which had long opposed SAB 121, applauded its repeal. They argued that the regulation imposed undue burdens on banks, effectively discouraging innovation in the burgeoning digital asset sector. The SEC’s decision to rescind SAB 121 represents a shift in regulatory approach, reflecting growing recognition of the need for a balanced framework that fosters innovation while protecting consumers.
Adding to the day’s developments, President Trump announced the creation of a government task force to review and potentially ease regulations in the digital asset sector. Concurrently, the SEC, now under Acting Chairman Mark Uyeda, launched its own task force aimed at developing a clear regulatory framework for crypto assets. Uyeda emphasized that past regulatory approaches had created confusion, stifled innovation, and inadvertently fostered environments conducive to fraud.
This repeal, combined with the new administration’s pro-crypto stance, signals a pivotal moment for the cryptocurrency industry, potentially ushering in an era of growth and innovation. Below, we delve deeper into the implications of these developments for the crypto sector, financial institutions, and the broader economy.
The Backstory: SAB 121 and Its Controversies
SAB 121 was introduced during a period of heightened scrutiny of the crypto industry. Under the bulletin, companies were required to recognize a safeguarding liability for crypto assets they held on behalf of customers, valuing these obligations at the fair market value of the assets. While intended to enhance transparency and ensure adequate risk management, the policy had several unintended consequences:
Increased Operational Costs: The safeguarding obligation significantly increased the financial burden on companies holding crypto assets. These costs deterred banks and financial institutions from entering the market.
Regulatory Uncertainty: The requirement blurred the lines between custodianship and ownership, creating legal ambiguities that made compliance challenging.
Stifled Innovation: By imposing stringent requirements, SAB 121 discouraged financial institutions from exploring new products and services in the digital asset space, effectively slowing down the sector’s growth.
In May 2024, bipartisan opposition in Congress led to a successful vote to overturn SAB 121. However, former President Biden’s veto late in the day on a Friday, sustained the regulation until the SEC’s recent decision to repeal it, after the resignation of Gary Ginsler. The repeal resolves a long-standing point of contention and sets the stage for a more innovation-friendly regulatory environment.
Implications of SAB 121’s Repeal for the Crypto Industry
The repeal of SAB 121 is expected to have far-reaching implications for the crypto industry. Here’s what it means:
1. Renewed Interest from Financial Institutions
Banks and financial institutions now have fewer barriers to entering the crypto market. The removal of the safeguarding liability reduces the perceived risks associated with offering crypto custody services. This could lead to:
Increased Adoption: More banks may offer cryptocurrency custody, trading, and investment products.
Greater Competition: Traditional financial institutions could compete with crypto-native firms, potentially driving innovation and reducing costs for consumers.
2. Boost to Innovation
By alleviating regulatory burdens, the repeal encourages experimentation and innovation in blockchain technology and digital assets. Startups and established firms alike may feel more confident investing in new projects, leading to advancements in areas such as decentralized finance (DeFi), tokenized assets and blockchain infrastructure.
3. Enhanced Market Confidence
The departure of Gary Gensler at the SEC marks a significant victory for the crypto lobby, which has long opposed his tenure due to the SEC’s stringent regulation of the industry. During his time as chair, the agency pursued prominent cases against major cryptocurrency firms, including Coinbase and Binance. Notably, the SEC reported that 18% of its enforcement actions were tied to the crypto sector.
The SEC’s recent acknowledgment of past missteps and its commitment to developing a clearer regulatory framework could improve investor confidence. A predictable and transparent regulatory environment is essential for attracting institutional investment, which is critical for the crypto industry’s long-term growth.
The Role of the Trump Administration
President Trump’s pro-crypto stance and the formation of a government task force dedicated to reviewing digital asset regulations further underscore the administration’s commitment to fostering growth in the sector. Key considerations include:
1. Policy Focus on Growth
The Trump administration has signaled an interest in reducing regulatory barriers to innovation. This approach aligns with broader efforts to position the United States as a global leader in blockchain and digital asset technology.
2. Family and Cabinet Involvement
With a history of entrepreneurial ventures, the Trump family—including high-profile figures like Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump—could influence the administration’s pro-business and pro-crypto policies. Similarly, cabinet members with experience in finance and technology are likely to advocate for balanced regulations that encourage innovation while protecting consumers.
3. International Competitiveness
Easing crypto regulations could help the U.S. compete with countries like Singapore and Switzerland, which have already established themselves as crypto-friendly jurisdictions. By creating a conducive environment for blockchain startups and crypto firms, the U.S. can attract global talent and investment.
Financial Implications
The repeal of SAB 121 and the administration’s pro-crypto stance are likely to have several financial ramifications:
1. Increased Investment
Institutional investors, previously wary of regulatory risks, may re-enter the market, driving capital inflows. This could lead to:
Higher Valuations: Increased demand for digital assets could push up valuations across the sector.
Expansion of Services: Financial institutions may roll out a broader range of crypto-related services, from custody solutions to lending platforms.
2. Job Creation
The growth of the crypto sector is expected to generate new jobs, from blockchain developers to compliance officers. This could have positive ripple effects on the economy, particularly in tech hubs like Silicon Valley and Austin, Texas.
3. Impact on Traditional Finance
As cryptocurrencies gain traction, traditional financial systems may face increased competition. Banks and payment processors will need to adapt to a world where blockchain technology plays a larger role in finance.
Challenges Ahead
While the repeal of SAB 121 is a step in the right direction, challenges remain:
Regulatory Clarity: The SEC’s task force must deliver a clear and comprehensive framework to avoid repeating past mistakes.
Consumer Protection: Ensuring that new regulations protect consumers without stifling innovation will be a delicate balancing act.
Global Coordination: As the crypto industry operates across borders, international regulatory alignment will be crucial to prevent arbitrage and ensure market stability.
Conclusion
The repeal of SAB 121 marks a significant milestone in the evolution of crypto regulation. Coupled with the Trump administration’s favorable stance and the SEC’s renewed focus on clarity, this development paves the way for a more vibrant and competitive digital asset ecosystem.
For financial institutions, the repeal eliminates a major obstacle, enabling them to explore new opportunities in the crypto space. For the crypto industry, it represents a chance to rebuild trust and attract investment. And for the broader economy, it offers the promise of innovation and growth in one of the most dynamic sectors of the 21st century.
As the SEC and government task forces work to craft a more balanced regulatory framework, stakeholders must collaborate to ensure that the U.S. remains at the forefront of the global crypto revolution.

